W-L includes settled directions. Profit and risk use captured prices only; authorized assumed-price history stays separate.
| Category | Settled W-L | Win % | Captured net | Captured priced | Assumed priced / net | Captured risk | Settled slates | Dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| Rebounds | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| 3PM | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| Game Totals | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction — |
Tipoff has passed or could not be verified. Projections and ranks remain visible only as dated audit evidence.
Ranks, projections, captured lines, and model directions are preserved for audit. They are not an active card after tip or during degraded recovery.
Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 3.0 vs internal injury model 2.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -41.4, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 30.2%, EV -0.254 units per unit risked.
Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 1.7 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 52.9%, EV -0.037 units per unit risked.
Over 12.5: model 12.5 vs RotoWire 13.7 vs internal injury model 12.7. shot zones -0.7, injury/rotation +0.2, 28.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.1%, EV -0.125 units per unit risked.
Over 5.5: model 6.2 vs RotoWire 7.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, rebound matchup grade -29.4, 28.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 58.0%, EV -0.055 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 28.0 projected minutes.
Over 7.5: model 7.8 vs RotoWire 8.4 vs internal injury model 8.6. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.7, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.5%, EV -0.017 units per unit risked.
Over 2.5: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 3.3 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade -39.4, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.4%, EV -0.040 units per unit risked.
Over 1.5: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 39.7%, EV +0.060 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.40.
Projection context: model 9.0 vs RotoWire 7.3 vs internal injury model 7.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.9, 15.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 47.1%, EV -0.066 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.8. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 15.0 projected minutes.
Over 8.5: model 8.4 vs RotoWire 8.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 25.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%, EV +0.024 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.05.
Projection context: model 1.8 vs RotoWire 2.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -41.1, 25.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 25.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.6 vs RotoWire 3.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.4, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 1.0 vs internal injury model 0.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.4, rebound matchup grade -32.8, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.5. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.9 vs RotoWire 4.7. shot zones -0.5, injury/rotation +0.3, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -15.5, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 0.3 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.0, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.5 vs RotoWire 2.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 5.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -20.2, 5.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 5.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 2.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.6, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade -31.7, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, rebound matchup grade -17.8, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 1.6. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.2, 6.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -25.5, 6.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 6.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.6, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.9, rebound matchup grade -6.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
| Short writeup | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Nneka Ogwumike · LA | 3PM | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.0 | +6.3 | -2.5 | -27.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Rae Burrell · LA | REB | 0.9 | 3.0 | 0.0 | -2.2 | -2.2 | -41.4 | +0.2 | 2.5+147 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -1.6 | 30.2%Market 40.5% | -0.254u-25.4% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 3.0 vs internal injury model 2.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -41.4, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 30.2%, EV -0.254 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Rae Burrell · LA | 3PM | 1.6 | 1.7 | -0.1 | -2.2 | -2.2 | -41.4 | +0.1 | 1.5-122 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 52.9%Market 55.0% | -0.037u-3.7% model ROI | Draftkings | Low research signal | Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 1.7 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 52.9%, EV -0.037 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Dearica Hamby · LA | PTS | 12.5 | 13.7 | -0.7 | -11.1 | -3.3 | -29.4 | +0.2 | 12.5-134 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.1%Market 57.3% | -0.125u-12.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 12.5: model 12.5 vs RotoWire 13.7 vs internal injury model 12.7. shot zones -0.7, injury/rotation +0.2, 28.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.1%, EV -0.125 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Dearica Hamby · LA | REB | 6.2 | 7.9 | 0.0 | -11.1 | -3.3 | -29.4 | +0.1 | 5.5-159 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.7 | 58.0%Market 61.4% | -0.055u-5.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 5.5: model 6.2 vs RotoWire 7.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, rebound matchup grade -29.4, 28.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 58.0%, EV -0.055 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Dearica Hamby · LA | 3PM | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | -11.1 | -3.3 | -29.4 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 28.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Ariel Atkins · LA | PTS | 7.8 | 8.4 | -0.1 | +8.4 | -2.2 | -39.4 | -0.7 | 7.5-110 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.3 | 51.5%Market 52.4% | -0.017u-1.7% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 7.5: model 7.8 vs RotoWire 8.4 vs internal injury model 8.6. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.7, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.5%, EV -0.017 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Ariel Atkins · LA | REB | 2.6 | 3.3 | 0.0 | +8.4 | -2.2 | -39.4 | -0.3 | 2.5-115 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 51.4%Market 53.5% | -0.040u-4.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 2.5: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 3.3 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade -39.4, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.4%, EV -0.040 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Ariel Atkins · LA | 3PM | 1.1 | 1.2 | -0.0 | +8.4 | -2.2 | -39.4 | -0.2 | 1.5+167 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.4 | 39.7%Market 37.5% | +0.060u+6.0% model ROI | Draftkings | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 1.5: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 39.7%, EV +0.060 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.40. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cameron Brink · LA | PTS | 9.0 | 7.3 | 0.0 | -1.2 | -1.1 | -24.1 | -0.9 | 9.5-102 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.5 | 47.1%Market 50.5% | -0.066u-6.6% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 9.0 vs RotoWire 7.3 vs internal injury model 7.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.9, 15.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 47.1%, EV -0.066 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cameron Brink · LA | 3PM | 0.7 | 0.7 | -0.0 | -1.2 | -1.1 | -24.1 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.8. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Erica Wheeler · LA | PTS | 8.4 | 8.3 | -0.1 | +2.3 | -2.9 | -41.1 | 0.0 | 8.5+106 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.7%Market 48.5% | +0.024u+2.4% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 8.5: model 8.4 vs RotoWire 8.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 25.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%, EV +0.024 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.05. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Erica Wheeler · LA | REB | 1.8 | 2.3 | 0.0 | +2.3 | -2.9 | -41.1 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.8 vs RotoWire 2.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -41.1, 25.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Erica Wheeler · LA | 3PM | 1.1 | 1.2 | -0.0 | +2.3 | -2.9 | -41.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 25.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Monique Akoa Makani · LA | PTS | 3.6 | 3.7 | +0.1 | +9.8 | -2.5 | -32.8 | -1.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.6 vs RotoWire 3.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.4, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Monique Akoa Makani · LA | REB | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +9.8 | -2.5 | -32.8 | -0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 1.0 vs internal injury model 0.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.4, rebound matchup grade -32.8, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Monique Akoa Makani · LA | 3PM | 0.4 | 0.5 | -0.0 | +9.8 | -2.5 | -32.8 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.5. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Tonie Morgan · LA | PTS | 3.9 | 4.7 | -0.5 | -4.8 | -2.5 | -15.5 | +0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.9 vs RotoWire 4.7. shot zones -0.5, injury/rotation +0.3, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Tonie Morgan · LA | REB | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.0 | -4.8 | -2.5 | -15.5 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -15.5, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Tonie Morgan · LA | 3PM | 0.4 | 0.3 | -0.2 | -4.8 | -2.5 | -15.5 | -0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 0.3 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.0, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Emma Cannon · LA | PTS | 3.5 | 2.7 | +0.1 | -5.0 | -2.2 | -20.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.5 vs RotoWire 2.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 5.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Emma Cannon · LA | REB | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | -5.0 | -2.2 | -20.2 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.2 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -20.2, 5.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Emma Cannon · LA | 3PM | 0.5 | 0.4 | +0.0 | -5.0 | -2.2 | -20.2 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 5.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Chance Gray · LA | PTS | 2.6 | 2.8 | 0.0 | -4.0 | -2.1 | -31.7 | -0.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 2.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.6, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Chance Gray · LA | REB | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | -4.0 | -2.1 | -31.7 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade -31.7, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Chance Gray · LA | 3PM | 0.5 | 0.6 | +0.0 | -4.0 | -2.1 | -31.7 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Kate Martin · LA | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.5 | -0.4 | -17.8 | -2.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Kate Martin · LA | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.5 | -0.4 | -17.8 | -1.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, rebound matchup grade -17.8, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Kate Martin · LA | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.5 | -0.4 | -17.8 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Jihyun Park · LA | PTS | 1.6 | 1.6 | +0.1 | +4.9 | -1.6 | -25.5 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 1.6. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.2, 6.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Jihyun Park · LA | REB | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | +4.9 | -1.6 | -25.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -25.5, 6.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Jihyun Park · LA | 3PM | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | +4.9 | -1.6 | -25.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 6.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Alissa Pili · LA | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | +2.3 | -1.4 | -6.2 | -1.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.6, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Alissa Pili · LA | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.3 | -1.4 | -6.2 | -1.9 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.9, rebound matchup grade -6.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Alissa Pili · LA | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.0 | +2.3 | -1.4 | -6.2 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
Outcome counts use the forward tracker and settle from completed boxscores. Financial results appear only for records explicitly scoped to authoritative sportsbook prices. Every eligible sportsbook pick is sized to profit one unit on a win.
Settled — through — · predictions captured through —| Points | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| Rebounds | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| 3PM | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| Game Totals | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions— |
Numbered by configured priority. Books holding no posted rows today are omitted rather than ranked above the ones every captured line came from.
Every entity links into the same projection and tracking graph.
Raw projections stay visible even when a primary line has not posted.