The game has tipped. Pre-tip projections remain as archived audit evidence while final results are pending.
This game has tipped but has not been marked final. The page preserves the pre-tip model for audit and hides all active target framing.
Ranks, projections, captured lines, and model directions remain visible for audit only.
Over 18.5: model 18.5 vs RotoWire 17.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV +0.010 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta +0.00.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes.
Over 15.5: model 16.1 vs RotoWire 16.2 vs internal injury model 17.9. shot zones +0.4, injury/rotation +0.0, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 52.9%, EV -0.012 units per unit risked.
Over 9.5: model 9.9 vs RotoWire 10.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +23.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 54.3%, EV -0.020 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.5 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 31.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 36.9%, EV -0.218 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 8.4 vs RotoWire 8.8 vs internal injury model 8.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%, EV -0.025 units per unit risked.
Over 2.5: model 2.4 vs RotoWire 3.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +14.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.6%, EV +0.015 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.10.
Projection context: model 1.2 vs RotoWire 1.4 vs internal injury model 1.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 42.2%, EV -0.157 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 7.3 vs RotoWire 8.0 vs internal injury model 6.8. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.5, 25.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.0%, EV -0.020 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 2.0 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade +11.6, 25.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.7 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.2, 25.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.7%, EV -0.147 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 6.4 vs RotoWire 7.3 vs internal injury model 6.0. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.4, 18.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.3%, EV -0.140 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 18.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.2 vs RotoWire 4.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.7 vs RotoWire 2.0 vs internal injury model 1.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.4, rebound matchup grade +10.9, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.5. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 6.0 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.9 vs RotoWire 3.1 vs internal injury model 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, rebound matchup grade +12.3, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, 7.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +9.9, 7.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 7.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +5.4, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -1.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +0.4, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 2.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +12.6, 2.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 2.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 2.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.3 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +13.1, 2.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 2.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.6, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +4.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 15.5: model 15.6 vs RotoWire 15.7 vs internal injury model 16.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.6%, EV +0.012 units per unit risked.
Over 7.5: model 8.4 vs RotoWire 10.1 vs internal injury model 8.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -27.5, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 59.8%, EV +0.162 units per unit risked.
| Short writeup | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Shakira Austin · WSH | PTS | 18.5 | 17.2 | 0.0 | +18.8 | -15.6 | +21.0 | +0.1 | 18.5+102 | over WSHArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.0%Market 49.5% | +0.010u+1.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 18.5: model 18.5 vs RotoWire 17.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV +0.010 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta +0.00. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Shakira Austin · WSH | 3PM | 0.3 | 0.6 | -0.0 | +18.8 | -15.6 | +21.0 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Kiki Iriafen · WSH | PTS | 16.1 | 16.2 | +0.4 | +27.6 | -12.1 | +23.1 | 0.0 | 15.5-115 | over WSHArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.6 | 52.9%Market 53.5% | -0.012u-1.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 15.5: model 16.1 vs RotoWire 16.2 vs internal injury model 17.9. shot zones +0.4, injury/rotation +0.0, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 52.9%, EV -0.012 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Kiki Iriafen · WSH | REB | 9.9 | 10.9 | 0.0 | +27.6 | -12.1 | +23.1 | 0.0 | 9.5-124 | over WSHArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.4 | 54.3%Market 55.4% | -0.020u-2.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 9.5: model 9.9 vs RotoWire 10.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +23.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 54.3%, EV -0.020 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Kiki Iriafen · WSH | 3PM | 0.2 | 0.6 | -0.0 | +27.6 | -12.1 | +23.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Sonia Citron · WSH | 3PM | 1.0 | 1.5 | -0.1 | +7.2 | -14.3 | +14.0 | -0.1 | 1.5+112 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.5 | 36.9%Market 47.2% | -0.218u-21.8% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.5 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 31.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 36.9%, EV -0.218 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Michaela Onyenwere · WSH | PTS | 8.4 | 8.8 | -0.1 | +8.3 | -10.0 | +14.1 | +0.1 | 8.5-104 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.7%Market 51.0% | -0.025u-2.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 8.4 vs RotoWire 8.8 vs internal injury model 8.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%, EV -0.025 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Michaela Onyenwere · WSH | REB | 2.4 | 3.4 | 0.0 | +8.3 | -10.0 | +14.1 | 0.0 | 2.5+109 | over WSHArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 48.6%Market 47.8% | +0.015u+1.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 2.5: model 2.4 vs RotoWire 3.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +14.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.6%, EV +0.015 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.10. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Michaela Onyenwere · WSH | 3PM | 1.2 | 1.4 | -0.1 | +8.3 | -10.0 | +14.1 | -0.1 | 1.5+100 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.3 | 42.2%Market 50.0% | -0.157u-15.7% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 1.2 vs RotoWire 1.4 vs internal injury model 1.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 42.2%, EV -0.157 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Georgia Amoore · WSH | PTS | 7.3 | 8.0 | -0.1 | -3.0 | -13.8 | +11.6 | -0.5 | 7.5+100 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.2 | 49.0%Market 50.0% | -0.020u-2.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 7.3 vs RotoWire 8.0 vs internal injury model 6.8. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.5, 25.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.0%, EV -0.020 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Georgia Amoore · WSH | REB | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -3.0 | -13.8 | +11.6 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 2.0 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade +11.6, 25.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Georgia Amoore · WSH | 3PM | 1.3 | 1.7 | -0.1 | -3.0 | -13.8 | +11.6 | -0.2 | 1.5-110 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.2 | 44.7%Market 52.4% | -0.147u-14.7% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.7 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.2, 25.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.7%, EV -0.147 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Lauren Betts · WSH | PTS | 6.4 | 7.3 | +0.3 | +23.3 | 0.0 | +16.3 | +0.4 | 6.5-134 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.3%Market 57.3% | -0.140u-14.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 6.4 vs RotoWire 7.3 vs internal injury model 6.0. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.4, 18.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.3%, EV -0.140 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Lauren Betts · WSH | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | +23.3 | 0.0 | +16.3 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 18.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Betnijah Laney-Hamilton · WSH | PTS | 4.2 | 4.7 | 0.0 | -4.5 | -10.8 | +10.9 | -0.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.2 vs RotoWire 4.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Betnijah Laney-Hamilton · WSH | REB | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -4.5 | -10.8 | +10.9 | -0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.7 vs RotoWire 2.0 vs internal injury model 1.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.4, rebound matchup grade +10.9, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Betnijah Laney-Hamilton · WSH | 3PM | 0.4 | 0.7 | -0.0 | -4.5 | -10.8 | +10.9 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.5. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cotie McMahon · WSH | PTS | 4.9 | 6.0 | 0.0 | +12.8 | -12.2 | +12.3 | +0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 6.0 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cotie McMahon · WSH | REB | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.0 | +12.8 | -12.2 | +12.3 | +0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.9 vs RotoWire 3.1 vs internal injury model 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, rebound matchup grade +12.3, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cotie McMahon · WSH | 3PM | 0.3 | 0.6 | -0.0 | +12.8 | -12.2 | +12.3 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Alicia Florez · WSH | PTS | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.0 | +9.1 | -13.2 | +9.9 | +0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.1, 7.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Alicia Florez · WSH | REB | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | +9.1 | -13.2 | +9.9 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +9.9, 7.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Alicia Florez · WSH | 3PM | 0.1 | 0.2 | -0.0 | +9.1 | -13.2 | +9.9 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 7.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Lucy Olsen · WSH | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.7 | -12.7 | +5.4 | -1.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Lucy Olsen · WSH | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.7 | -12.7 | +5.4 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +5.4, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Lucy Olsen · WSH | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.7 | -12.7 | +5.4 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Darianna Littlepage-Buggs · WSH | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.4 | -1.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -1.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Darianna Littlepage-Buggs · WSH | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.4 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +0.4, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Darianna Littlepage-Buggs · WSH | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.4 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Angela Dugalic · WSH | PTS | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.0 | +17.1 | -13.0 | +12.6 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 2.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Angela Dugalic · WSH | REB | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | +17.1 | -13.0 | +12.6 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +12.6, 2.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Angela Dugalic · WSH | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.0 | +17.1 | -13.0 | +12.6 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 2.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cassandre Prosper · WSH | PTS | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | +14.3 | -12.1 | +13.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 2.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cassandre Prosper · WSH | REB | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | +14.3 | -12.1 | +13.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.3 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +13.1, 2.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Cassandre Prosper · WSH | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | +14.3 | -12.1 | +13.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 2.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Rori Harmon · WSH | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2.9 | -5.9 | +4.0 | -0.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.6, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Rori Harmon · WSH | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2.9 | -5.9 | +4.0 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +4.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Rori Harmon · WSH | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2.9 | -5.9 | +4.0 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Nneka Ogwumike · LA | PTS | 15.6 | 15.7 | -0.1 | +6.3 | -2.5 | -27.5 | 0.0 | 15.5+100 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 50.6%Market 50.0% | +0.012u+1.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 15.5: model 15.6 vs RotoWire 15.7 vs internal injury model 16.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.6%, EV +0.012 units per unit risked. |
| — | WSH @ LAAug 28, 2026 | Nneka Ogwumike · LA | REB | 8.4 | 10.1 | 0.0 | +6.3 | -2.5 | -27.5 | 0.0 | 7.5-106 | over LAArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.9 | 59.8%Market 51.5% | +0.162u+16.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 7.5: model 8.4 vs RotoWire 10.1 vs internal injury model 8.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -27.5, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 59.8%, EV +0.162 units per unit risked. |
Bars run toward the team that leads each metric, sized by the gap. Defense and turnover rows score the lower number as the lead.
| Away | Metric | Home | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-15 | Context: Record | 13-25 | Higher is better |
| 7-3 | Context: Last 10 | 2-8 | Higher is better |
| 82.0 | Context: Pace | 84.5 | Context only; no leader declared |
| 82.8 | Offense: Points per game | 87.3 | Higher is better |
| 100.9 | Offense: Offensive rating | 103.1 | Higher is better |
| 19.5 | Offense: Assists | 21.7 | Higher is better |
| 50.0% | Shooting: Effective FG% | 50.0% | Higher is better |
| 30.0% | Shooting: 3-point rate | 40.0% | Context only; no leader declared |
| 42.9 | Shooting: Paint points | 40.9 | Higher is better |
| 82.9 | Defense: Opponent points | 92.5 | Lower is better |
| 101.1 | Defense: Defensive rating | 109.3 | Lower is better |
| 50.0% | Defense: Opponent eFG% | 50.0% | Lower is better |
| 37.7 | Possession: Rebounds | 31.1 | Higher is better |
| 15.8 | Possession: Turnovers | 15.1 | Lower is better |
Player and team names remain navigable from both tables.
WSH projected rotation. Every player opens a full profile.
| Sonia Citron | G | starter | 31.0 | 15.2 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 22.3 | 72.0% |
| Shakira Austin | C | starter | 30.0 | 18.5 | 9.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 30.1 | 72.0% |
| Kiki Iriafen | F | starter | 30.0 | 17.9 | 9.9 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 29.4 | 72.0% |
| Georgia Amoore | G | starter | 25.0 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 11.9 | 72.0% |
| Michaela Onyenwere | F | starter | 23.0 | 8.3 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 12.1 | 72.0% |
| Lauren Betts | C | restricted | 18.0 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 10.9 | 72.0% |
| Cotie McMahon | G | restricted | 17.0 | 4.9 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 8.3 | 72.0% |
| Betnijah Laney-Hamilton | G | starter | 15.0 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 7.6 | 72.0% |
| Alicia Florez | G | restricted | 7.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 72.0% |
| Angela Dugalic | F | restricted | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 72.0% |
| Cassandre Prosper | G | restricted | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 90.0% |
| Lucy Olsen | G | restricted | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 72.0% |
| Darianna Littlepage-Buggs | G | restricted | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 72.0% |
| Rori Harmon | G | restricted | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 72.0% |
LA projected rotation. Every player opens a full profile.
| Nneka Ogwumike | F | starter | 30.0 | 16.0 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 27.2 | 72.0% |
| Rae Burrell | G | starter | 30.0 | 14.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 19.1 | 72.0% |
| Dearica Hamby | F | starter | 28.0 | 12.6 | 6.2 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 20.9 | 72.0% |
| Ariel Atkins | G | starter | 26.0 | 8.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 13.9 | 72.0% |
| Erica Wheeler | G | starter | 25.0 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 14.5 | 72.0% |
| Cameron Brink | F | bench | 15.0 | 7.5 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 12.7 | 72.0% |
| Tonie Morgan | G | restricted | 15.0 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 6.5 | 72.0% |
| Monique Akoa Makani | G | restricted | 10.0 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 5.2 | 72.0% |
| Chance Gray | G | bench | 10.0 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 72.0% |
| Jihyun Park | F | restricted | 6.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 72.0% |
| Emma Cannon | F | restricted | 5.0 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 98.0% |
| Kate Martin | G | restricted | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 72.0% |
| Alissa Pili | F | restricted | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 90.0% |
Compare where each offense has taken and converted shots across the 2026 season.
Compare where each team suppresses or allows made shots.
Positive zones have allowed more made shots than league context; negative zones have suppressed them.
Source: current_zone_team_defense_recency_blend
Read zone signals together with projected minutes, current injuries, and lineup status.
Source: current_zone_team_defense_recency_blend
Completed meetings, linked to each game and both team profiles.
| Aug 15, 2026 | LA @ WSH | Los Angeles Sparks | Washington Mystics | 70-80 | WSH |
| May 29, 2026 | LA @ WSH | Los Angeles Sparks | Washington Mystics | 92-87 | LA |
Status: rotowire_projected.
Player rows blend the fitted baseline, current role and minutes, 2026 form, and zone-defense context. Market availability changes the displayed direction, not the raw projection.