Review every model projection preserved in this board snapshot, its real source when a line exists, and the category's forward-tracker record.
Rows in this board snapshot retain their player, team, matchup, and source links.
Over 5.5: model 5.6 vs RotoWire 7.4 vs internal injury model 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.9%, EV -0.110 units per unit risked.
Over 2.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -13.9, 24.9 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.7%, EV -0.072 units per unit risked.
Over 3.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7 vs internal injury model 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -12.4, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 43.9%, EV +0.066 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.47.
Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 4.3 vs internal injury model 2.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -10.8, 25.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 7.7 vs internal injury model 5.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.5, rebound matchup grade -6.9, 24.9 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, rebound matchup grade -9.7, 10.1 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade -7.7, 10.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -4.5, rebound matchup grade -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 12.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -4.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 6.0. injury/rotation -6.0, rebound matchup grade -4.4, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 2.4 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +2.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.5%, EV -0.176 units per unit risked.
Over 3.5: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +8.5, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.4%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 3.2 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, rebound matchup grade +4.8, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.8 vs RotoWire 5.8 vs internal injury model 3.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.3, rebound matchup grade +5.9, 20.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 3.3 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade +6.3, 23.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.4, rebound matchup grade +6.7, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +0.5, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +3.5, 9.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +4.1, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.2. injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +0.9, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade +3.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 1.5: model 2.1 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -20.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 58.7%, EV -0.085 units per unit risked.
Over 4.5: model 4.8 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 4.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -16.9, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 53.7%, EV +0.117 units per unit risked.
Over 4.5: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -17.9, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 55.0%, EV +0.182 units per unit risked.
Over 5.5: model 6.1 vs RotoWire 7.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.7, rebound matchup grade -15.3, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.8%, EV -0.070 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 3.1 vs RotoWire 3.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -15.2, 13.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.2 vs RotoWire 3.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -19.3, 19.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.5 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -20.2, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.4 vs RotoWire 2.0 vs internal injury model 1.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -18.2, 16.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 2.1 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -20.1, 13.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.4, rebound matchup grade -10.8, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation -1.7, rebound matchup grade -1.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.5 vs RotoWire 4.3 vs internal injury model 3.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +7.6, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV -0.024 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 4.1 vs RotoWire 6.8 vs internal injury model 4.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.3, rebound matchup grade +7.7, 16.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.9%.
Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 2.1 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +5.3, 16.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +3.6, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade +1.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.0, rebound matchup grade +5.3, 0.0 projected minutes.
| Short writeup | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aaliyah Edwards · CON | REB | 5.6 | 7.4 | 0.0 | +15.8 | -36.7 | -9.5 | +0.6 | 5.5-134 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 50.9%Market 57.3% | -0.110u-11.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 5.5: model 5.6 vs RotoWire 7.4 vs internal injury model 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.9%, EV -0.110 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Diamond Miller · CON | REB | 3.0 | 3.7 | 0.0 | -1.7 | -30.4 | -13.9 | -0.2 | 2.5-157 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.5 | 56.7%Market 61.1% | -0.072u-7.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Medium research signal | Over 2.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -13.9, 24.9 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.7%, EV -0.072 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Saniya Rivers · CON | REB | 3.0 | 3.7 | 0.0 | +8.0 | -31.8 | -12.4 | 0.0 | 3.5+143 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.5 | 43.9%Market 41.2% | +0.066u+6.6% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 3.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7 vs internal injury model 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -12.4, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 43.9%, EV +0.066 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.47. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Nell Angloma · CON | REB | 1.6 | 4.3 | 0.0 | +6.9 | -34.9 | -10.8 | +0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 4.3 vs internal injury model 2.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -10.8, 25.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raegan Beers · CON | REB | 4.5 | 7.7 | 0.0 | +15.4 | -28.4 | -6.9 | +0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 7.7 vs internal injury model 5.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.5, rebound matchup grade -6.9, 24.9 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Hailey Van Lith · CON | REB | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | +2.0 | -32.8 | -9.7 | -0.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, rebound matchup grade -9.7, 10.1 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Gianna Kneepkens · CON | REB | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | -6.3 | -33.5 | -7.7 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade -7.7, 10.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Rayah Marshall · CON | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +4.8 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -4.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -4.5, rebound matchup grade -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Ashlon Jackson · CON | REB | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.0 | -17.1 | -35.1 | -9.5 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 12.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Griner · CON | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -4.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Olivia Nelson-Ododa · CON | REB | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.4 | -6.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 6.0. injury/rotation -6.0, rebound matchup grade -4.4, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Kelsey Mitchell · IND | REB | 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.0 | -6.2 | -18.6 | +2.1 | -0.1 | 1.5-167 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 51.5%Market 62.5% | -0.176u-17.6% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 2.4 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +2.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.5%, EV -0.176 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Caitlin Clark · IND | REB | 4.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | -7.6 | -17.5 | +8.5 | 0.0 | 3.5-129 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.5 | 56.4%Market 56.3% | +0.002u+0.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 3.5: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +8.5, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.4%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Lexie Hull · IND | REB | 2.6 | 3.2 | 0.0 | -10.1 | -23.9 | +4.8 | -1.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 3.2 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, rebound matchup grade +4.8, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Monique Billings · IND | REB | 2.8 | 5.8 | 0.0 | +4.3 | -34.6 | +5.9 | +0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.8 vs RotoWire 5.8 vs internal injury model 3.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.3, rebound matchup grade +5.9, 20.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Sophie Cunningham · IND | REB | 0.0 | 3.3 | 0.0 | -13.7 | -21.7 | +6.3 | +0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 3.3 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade +6.3, 23.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Myisha Hines-Allen · IND | REB | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | +0.8 | -24.8 | +6.7 | -2.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.4, rebound matchup grade +6.7, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Bree Hall · IND | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +0.5, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Tyasha Harris · IND | REB | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.0 | -8.5 | -18.7 | +3.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +3.5, 9.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raven Johnson · IND | REB | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | -1.2 | -24.5 | +4.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +4.1, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Mercedes Russell · IND | REB | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.9 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.2. injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +0.9, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Grace VanSlooten · IND | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.1 | -6.9 | +3.0 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade +3.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Michelle Onyiah · IND | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Carla Leite · POR | REB | 2.1 | 3.2 | 0.0 | -13.2 | -11.7 | -20.9 | 0.0 | 1.5-179 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.6 | 58.7%Market 64.2% | -0.085u-8.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | High research signal | Over 1.5: model 2.1 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -20.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 58.7%, EV -0.085 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Bridget Carleton · POR | REB | 4.8 | 6.5 | 0.0 | -12.7 | -11.4 | -16.9 | -0.2 | 4.5+108 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.3 | 53.7%Market 48.1% | +0.117u+11.7% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 4.5: model 4.8 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 4.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -16.9, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 53.7%, EV +0.117 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Megan DiLeo · POR | REB | 4.9 | 6.5 | 0.0 | -12.6 | -11.2 | -17.9 | -0.1 | 4.5+115 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.4 | 55.0%Market 46.5% | +0.182u+18.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 4.5: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -17.9, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 55.0%, EV +0.182 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Emily Engstler · POR | REB | 6.1 | 7.7 | 0.0 | -13.5 | -10.7 | -15.3 | -0.7 | 5.5-157 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.6 | 56.8%Market 61.1% | -0.070u-7.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 5.5: model 6.1 vs RotoWire 7.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.7, rebound matchup grade -15.3, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.8%, EV -0.070 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Serah Williams · POR | REB | 3.1 | 3.5 | 0.0 | -9.2 | -10.4 | -15.2 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.1 vs RotoWire 3.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -15.2, 13.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Nyadiew Puoch · POR | REB | 2.2 | 3.1 | 0.0 | -8.5 | -9.4 | -19.3 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.2 vs RotoWire 3.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -19.3, 19.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Teja Oblak · POR | REB | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.0 | -12.2 | -11.5 | -20.2 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.5 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -20.2, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Karlie Samuelson · POR | REB | 1.4 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -9.0 | -10.3 | -18.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.4 vs RotoWire 2.0 vs internal injury model 1.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -18.2, 16.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Holly Winterburn · POR | REB | 1.6 | 2.1 | 0.0 | -15.2 | -12.0 | -20.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 2.1 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -20.1, 13.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Jordan Harrison · POR | REB | 0.3 | 2.7 | 0.0 | -11.6 | -10.6 | -10.8 | +0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.4, rebound matchup grade -10.8, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Amy Okonkwo · POR | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.1 | -1.7 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation -1.7, rebound matchup grade -1.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Jordin Canada · ATL | REB | 3.5 | 4.3 | 0.0 | +2.9 | +21.6 | +7.6 | -0.1 | 3.5-105 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.0%Market 51.2% | -0.024u-2.4% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 3.5 vs RotoWire 4.3 vs internal injury model 3.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +7.6, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV -0.024 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Madina Okot · ATL | REB | 4.1 | 6.8 | 0.0 | +4.9 | +19.9 | +7.7 | +0.3 | 4.5Line only | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.4 | 44.9% | —Captured price needed | PrizePicks | Market matches model | Projection context: model 4.1 vs RotoWire 6.8 vs internal injury model 4.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.3, rebound matchup grade +7.7, 16.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.9%. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Isobel Borlase · ATL | REB | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.0 | +5.1 | +22.1 | +5.3 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 2.1 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +5.3, 16.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Te-Hina Paopao · ATL | REB | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | +9.2 | +22.0 | +3.6 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +3.6, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Shatori Walker-Kimbrough · ATL | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.1 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade +1.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Sika Kone · ATL | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +6.5 | +16.2 | +5.3 | -1.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.0, rebound matchup grade +5.3, 0.0 projected minutes. |
This category is one row in the four-category forward-results contract. W-L may include settled line-only directions; profit and risk use captured prices only.