Review every model projection preserved in this board snapshot, its real source when a line exists, and the category's forward-tracker record.
Rows in this board snapshot retain their player, team, matchup, and source links.
Over 13.5: model 14.6 vs RotoWire 15.7 vs internal injury model 17.9. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +1.7, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 54.8%, EV +0.025 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 9.3 vs RotoWire 9.9 vs internal injury model 8.9. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation +0.2, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.2%, EV -0.080 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 9.2 vs RotoWire 10.7 vs internal injury model 8.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.4, 32.5 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV -0.028 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 7.5 vs RotoWire 9.1. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 25.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%.
Projection context: model 6.8 vs RotoWire 8.7 vs internal injury model 6.9. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.6, 24.9 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.2 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation -2.5, 10.1 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.4 vs RotoWire 3.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.3, 10.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -3.8, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.5 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.4, 12.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 9.1. injury/rotation -9.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 25.5: model 25.1 vs RotoWire 22.5 vs internal injury model 23.8. shot zones -0.7, injury/rotation -0.5, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV +0.001 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.43.
Over 16.5: model 16.9 vs RotoWire 16.7 vs internal injury model 18.2. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV -0.074 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 4.2 vs RotoWire 4.9 vs internal injury model 4.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.8, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 5.8 vs RotoWire 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, 20.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 6.9 vs RotoWire 8.4 vs internal injury model 5.3. shot zones -0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 46.7%, EV -0.127 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.7, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -3.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 9.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 1.1. injury/rotation -0.2, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 15.5: model 15.9 vs RotoWire 16.5 vs internal injury model 17.1. shot zones -0.4, injury/rotation +0.0, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 5.5 vs RotoWire 4.6. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.3, 13.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 4.6. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.4, 19.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.6 vs RotoWire 4.2 vs internal injury model 4.7. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.4 vs RotoWire 5.2 vs internal injury model 4.5. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 16.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 4.2 vs internal injury model 4.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 13.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.6 vs RotoWire 6.0 vs internal injury model 4.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +1.1, 15.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation -3.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 18.5: model 18.4 vs RotoWire 17.9 vs internal injury model 18.2. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.3, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%, EV +0.028 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.07.
Over 10.5: model 10.7 vs RotoWire 11.5 vs internal injury model 11.3. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.1%, EV -0.108 units per unit risked.
Over 9.5: model 9.6 vs RotoWire 9.8 vs internal injury model 9.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.5, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.3%, EV -0.032 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 7.9 vs RotoWire 9.6 vs internal injury model 8.0. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.6, 16.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 5.9 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 16.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.2 vs RotoWire 3.5 vs internal injury model 3.3. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 10.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -2.7, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.9, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.9, 0.0 projected minutes.
| Short writeup | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aaliyah Edwards · CON | PTS | 14.6 | 15.7 | +0.3 | +15.8 | -36.7 | -9.5 | +1.7 | 13.5-115 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | 1.1 | 54.8%Market 53.5% | +0.025u+2.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 13.5: model 14.6 vs RotoWire 15.7 vs internal injury model 17.9. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +1.7, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 54.8%, EV +0.025 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Saniya Rivers · CON | PTS | 9.3 | 9.9 | +0.2 | +8.0 | -31.8 | -12.4 | +0.2 | 9.5-115 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.2%Market 53.5% | -0.080u-8.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 9.3 vs RotoWire 9.9 vs internal injury model 8.9. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation +0.2, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.2%, EV -0.080 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Charlisse Leger-Walker · CON | PTS | 9.2 | 10.7 | +0.1 | -3.6 | -34.6 | -12.8 | +0.4 | 9.5+102 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.3 | 48.1%Market 49.5% | -0.028u-2.8% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 9.2 vs RotoWire 10.7 vs internal injury model 8.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.4, 32.5 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV -0.028 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Nell Angloma · CON | PTS | 7.5 | 9.1 | +0.3 | +6.9 | -34.9 | -10.8 | +0.7 | 7.5Line only | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.7% | —Captured price needed | PrizePicks | Market matches model | Projection context: model 7.5 vs RotoWire 9.1. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 25.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raegan Beers · CON | PTS | 6.8 | 8.7 | +0.1 | +15.4 | -28.4 | -6.9 | +0.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 6.8 vs RotoWire 8.7 vs internal injury model 6.9. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.6, 24.9 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Hailey Van Lith · CON | PTS | 3.2 | 3.2 | +0.2 | +2.0 | -32.8 | -9.7 | -2.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.2 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation -2.5, 10.1 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Gianna Kneepkens · CON | PTS | 3.4 | 3.1 | +0.1 | -6.3 | -33.5 | -7.7 | -1.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.4 vs RotoWire 3.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.3, 10.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Rayah Marshall · CON | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +4.8 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -3.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -3.8, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Ashlon Jackson · CON | PTS | 2.3 | 2.5 | +0.1 | -17.1 | -35.1 | -9.5 | -0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.5 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.4, 12.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Griner · CON | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Olivia Nelson-Ododa · CON | PTS | 0.0 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.4 | -9.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 9.1. injury/rotation -9.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Kelsey Mitchell · IND | PTS | 25.1 | 22.5 | -0.7 | -6.2 | -18.6 | +2.1 | -0.5 | 25.5+108 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.4 | 48.1%Market 48.1% | +0.001u+0.1% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 25.5: model 25.1 vs RotoWire 22.5 vs internal injury model 23.8. shot zones -0.7, injury/rotation -0.5, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV +0.001 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.43. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aliyah Boston · IND | PTS | 16.9 | 16.7 | +0.1 | +8.2 | -19.4 | +13.6 | +0.9 | 16.5-127 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.4 | 51.8%Market 55.9% | -0.074u-7.4% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 16.5: model 16.9 vs RotoWire 16.7 vs internal injury model 18.2. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV -0.074 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Lexie Hull · IND | PTS | 4.2 | 4.9 | 0.0 | -10.1 | -23.9 | +4.8 | -1.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.2 vs RotoWire 4.9 vs internal injury model 4.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.8, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Monique Billings · IND | PTS | 5.8 | 7.0 | 0.0 | +4.3 | -34.6 | +5.9 | +0.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 5.8 vs RotoWire 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, 20.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Sophie Cunningham · IND | PTS | 6.9 | 8.4 | -0.3 | -13.7 | -21.7 | +6.3 | +0.7 | 7.5-115 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.6 | 46.7%Market 53.5% | -0.127u-12.7% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 6.9 vs RotoWire 8.4 vs internal injury model 5.3. shot zones -0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 46.7%, EV -0.127 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Myisha Hines-Allen · IND | PTS | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | +0.8 | -24.8 | +6.7 | -2.7 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.7, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Bree Hall · IND | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | -3.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -3.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Tyasha Harris · IND | PTS | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.0 | -8.5 | -18.7 | +3.5 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 9.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raven Johnson · IND | PTS | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 | -1.2 | -24.5 | +4.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Mercedes Russell · IND | PTS | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.9 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 1.1. injury/rotation -0.2, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Grace VanSlooten · IND | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.1 | -6.9 | +3.0 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Michelle Onyiah · IND | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Carla Leite · POR | PTS | 15.9 | 16.5 | -0.4 | -13.2 | -11.7 | -20.9 | 0.0 | 15.5-107 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.4 | 51.8%Market 51.7% | +0.002u+0.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 15.5: model 15.9 vs RotoWire 16.5 vs internal injury model 17.1. shot zones -0.4, injury/rotation +0.0, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Serah Williams · POR | PTS | 5.5 | 4.6 | +0.1 | -9.2 | -10.4 | -15.2 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 5.5 vs RotoWire 4.6. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.3, 13.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Nyadiew Puoch · POR | PTS | 4.5 | 4.6 | -0.1 | -8.5 | -9.4 | -19.3 | -0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 4.6. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.4, 19.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Teja Oblak · POR | PTS | 4.6 | 4.2 | -0.1 | -12.2 | -11.5 | -20.2 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.6 vs RotoWire 4.2 vs internal injury model 4.7. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Karlie Samuelson · POR | PTS | 4.4 | 5.2 | -0.1 | -9.0 | -10.3 | -18.2 | +0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.4 vs RotoWire 5.2 vs internal injury model 4.5. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 16.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Holly Winterburn · POR | PTS | 4.0 | 4.2 | 0.0 | -15.2 | -12.0 | -20.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 4.2 vs internal injury model 4.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 13.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Jordan Harrison · POR | PTS | 4.6 | 6.0 | 0.0 | -11.6 | -10.6 | -10.8 | +1.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.6 vs RotoWire 6.0 vs internal injury model 4.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +1.1, 15.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Amy Okonkwo · POR | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.1 | -3.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation -3.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Rhyne Howard · ATL | PTS | 18.4 | 17.9 | +0.3 | +9.0 | +22.4 | +7.1 | +0.3 | 18.5+107 | over ATLArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.7%Market 48.3% | +0.028u+2.8% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 18.5: model 18.4 vs RotoWire 17.9 vs internal injury model 18.2. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.3, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%, EV +0.028 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.07. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Jordin Canada · ATL | PTS | 10.7 | 11.5 | +0.1 | +2.9 | +21.6 | +7.6 | 0.0 | 10.5-134 | over ATLArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.2 | 51.1%Market 57.3% | -0.108u-10.8% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 10.5: model 10.7 vs RotoWire 11.5 vs internal injury model 11.3. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.1%, EV -0.108 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Naz Hillmon · ATL | PTS | 9.6 | 9.8 | +0.1 | +12.6 | +19.4 | +8.8 | -0.5 | 9.5-108 | over ATLArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 50.3%Market 51.9% | -0.032u-3.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 9.5: model 9.6 vs RotoWire 9.8 vs internal injury model 9.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.5, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.3%, EV -0.032 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Madina Okot · ATL | PTS | 7.9 | 9.6 | +0.3 | +4.9 | +19.9 | +7.7 | +0.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 7.9 vs RotoWire 9.6 vs internal injury model 8.0. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.6, 16.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Isobel Borlase · ATL | PTS | 4.9 | 5.9 | +0.1 | +5.1 | +22.1 | +5.3 | +0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 5.9 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 16.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Te-Hina Paopao · ATL | PTS | 3.2 | 3.5 | +0.1 | +9.2 | +22.0 | +3.6 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.2 vs RotoWire 3.5 vs internal injury model 3.3. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 10.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Shatori Walker-Kimbrough · ATL | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.1 | -2.7 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -2.7, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Sika Kone · ATL | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +6.5 | +16.2 | +5.3 | -1.9 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.9, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Indya Nivar · ATL | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | +2.9 | +13.8 | +3.5 | -0.9 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.9, 0.0 projected minutes. |
This category is one row in the four-category forward-results contract. W-L may include settled line-only directions; profit and risk use captured prices only.