W-L includes settled directions. Profit and risk use captured prices only; authorized assumed-price history stays separate.
| Category | Settled W-L | Win % | Captured net | Captured priced | Assumed priced / net | Captured risk | Settled slates | Dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| Rebounds | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| 3PM | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| Game Totals | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction — |
Tipoff has passed or could not be verified. Projections and ranks remain visible only as dated audit evidence.
Ranks, projections, captured lines, and model directions are preserved for audit. They are not an active card after tip or during degraded recovery.
Over 0.5: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.0 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.0, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 62.3%, EV -0.064 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 26.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.2 vs RotoWire 4.9 vs internal injury model 4.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.8, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 3.2 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, rebound matchup grade +4.8, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 17.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 5.8 vs RotoWire 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, 20.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.8 vs RotoWire 5.8 vs internal injury model 3.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.3, rebound matchup grade +5.9, 20.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 20.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 6.9 vs RotoWire 8.4 vs internal injury model 5.3. shot zones -0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 46.7%, EV -0.127 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 3.3 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade +6.3, 23.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 1.4 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 33.2%, EV -0.277 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.7, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.4, rebound matchup grade +6.7, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -3.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +0.5, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.4, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 9.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +3.5, 9.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 9.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +4.1, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 1.1. injury/rotation -0.2, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.2. injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +0.9, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. injury/rotation +0.0, 3.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade +3.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 15.5: model 15.9 vs RotoWire 16.5 vs internal injury model 17.1. shot zones -0.4, injury/rotation +0.0, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked.
Over 1.5: model 2.1 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -20.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 58.7%, EV -0.085 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 1.0 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 29.0 projected minutes.
Over 4.5: model 4.8 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 4.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -16.9, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 53.7%, EV +0.117 units per unit risked.
Over 2.5: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.1, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 52.0%, EV -0.064 units per unit risked.
Over 4.5: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -17.9, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 55.0%, EV +0.182 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.4 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.3%, EV -0.079 units per unit risked.
Over 5.5: model 6.1 vs RotoWire 7.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.7, rebound matchup grade -15.3, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.8%, EV -0.070 units per unit risked.
| Short writeup | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aliyah Boston · IND | 3PM | 1.0 | 1.0 | -0.1 | +8.2 | -19.4 | +13.6 | -0.0 | 0.5-199 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.5 | 62.3%Market 66.6% | -0.064u-6.4% model ROI | Draftkings | High research signal | Over 0.5: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.0 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.0, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 62.3%, EV -0.064 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Makayla Timpson · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | +12.1 | 0.0 | +8.3 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 26.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Lexie Hull · IND | PTS | 4.2 | 4.9 | 0.0 | -10.1 | -23.9 | +4.8 | -1.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.2 vs RotoWire 4.9 vs internal injury model 4.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.8, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Lexie Hull · IND | REB | 2.6 | 3.2 | 0.0 | -10.1 | -23.9 | +4.8 | -1.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 3.2 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -1.2, rebound matchup grade +4.8, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Lexie Hull · IND | 3PM | 0.5 | 0.7 | -0.0 | -10.1 | -23.9 | +4.8 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 17.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Monique Billings · IND | PTS | 5.8 | 7.0 | 0.0 | +4.3 | -34.6 | +5.9 | +0.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 5.8 vs RotoWire 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, 20.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Monique Billings · IND | REB | 2.8 | 5.8 | 0.0 | +4.3 | -34.6 | +5.9 | +0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.8 vs RotoWire 5.8 vs internal injury model 3.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.3, rebound matchup grade +5.9, 20.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Monique Billings · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.0 | +4.3 | -34.6 | +5.9 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 20.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Sophie Cunningham · IND | PTS | 6.9 | 8.4 | -0.3 | -13.7 | -21.7 | +6.3 | +0.7 | 7.5-115 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.6 | 46.7%Market 53.5% | -0.127u-12.7% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 6.9 vs RotoWire 8.4 vs internal injury model 5.3. shot zones -0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 46.7%, EV -0.127 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Sophie Cunningham · IND | REB | 0.0 | 3.3 | 0.0 | -13.7 | -21.7 | +6.3 | +0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 3.3 vs internal injury model 1.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade +6.3, 23.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Sophie Cunningham · IND | 3PM | 0.9 | 1.4 | -0.1 | -13.7 | -21.7 | +6.3 | +0.1 | 1.5+118 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.6 | 33.2%Market 45.9% | -0.277u-27.7% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 1.4 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation +0.1, 23.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 33.2%, EV -0.277 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Myisha Hines-Allen · IND | PTS | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | +0.8 | -24.8 | +6.7 | -2.7 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.7, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Myisha Hines-Allen · IND | REB | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | +0.8 | -24.8 | +6.7 | -2.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -2.4, rebound matchup grade +6.7, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Myisha Hines-Allen · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.0 | +0.8 | -24.8 | +6.7 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Bree Hall · IND | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | -3.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -3.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Bree Hall · IND | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.3, rebound matchup grade +0.5, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Bree Hall · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | -0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation -0.4, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Tyasha Harris · IND | PTS | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.0 | -8.5 | -18.7 | +3.5 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 9.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Tyasha Harris · IND | REB | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.0 | -8.5 | -18.7 | +3.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +3.5, 9.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Tyasha Harris · IND | 3PM | 0.3 | 0.4 | -0.0 | -8.5 | -18.7 | +3.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 9.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raven Johnson · IND | PTS | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 | -1.2 | -24.5 | +4.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raven Johnson · IND | REB | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | -1.2 | -24.5 | +4.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.6 vs RotoWire 0.6 vs internal injury model 0.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +4.1, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raven Johnson · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | -1.2 | -24.5 | +4.1 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Mercedes Russell · IND | PTS | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.9 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 1.1. injury/rotation -0.2, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Mercedes Russell · IND | REB | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.9 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.2. injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +0.9, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Mercedes Russell · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.9 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. injury/rotation +0.0, 3.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Grace VanSlooten · IND | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.1 | -6.9 | +3.0 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Grace VanSlooten · IND | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.1 | -6.9 | +3.0 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade +3.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Grace VanSlooten · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.1 | -6.9 | +3.0 | -0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Michelle Onyiah · IND | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Michelle Onyiah · IND | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Michelle Onyiah · IND | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Carla Leite · POR | PTS | 15.9 | 16.5 | -0.4 | -13.2 | -11.7 | -20.9 | 0.0 | 15.5-107 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.4 | 51.8%Market 51.7% | +0.002u+0.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 15.5: model 15.9 vs RotoWire 16.5 vs internal injury model 17.1. shot zones -0.4, injury/rotation +0.0, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Carla Leite · POR | REB | 2.1 | 3.2 | 0.0 | -13.2 | -11.7 | -20.9 | 0.0 | 1.5-179 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.6 | 58.7%Market 64.2% | -0.085u-8.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | High research signal | Over 1.5: model 2.1 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -20.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 58.7%, EV -0.085 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Carla Leite · POR | 3PM | 0.8 | 1.0 | -0.1 | -13.2 | -11.7 | -20.9 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 1.0 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 29.0 projected minutes. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Bridget Carleton · POR | REB | 4.8 | 6.5 | 0.0 | -12.7 | -11.4 | -16.9 | -0.2 | 4.5+108 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.3 | 53.7%Market 48.1% | +0.117u+11.7% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 4.5: model 4.8 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 4.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -16.9, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 53.7%, EV +0.117 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Bridget Carleton · POR | 3PM | 2.6 | 2.7 | -0.2 | -12.7 | -11.4 | -16.9 | -0.1 | 2.5-125 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 52.0%Market 55.6% | -0.064u-6.4% model ROI | Draftkings | Low research signal | Over 2.5: model 2.6 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.7. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.1, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 52.0%, EV -0.064 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Megan DiLeo · POR | REB | 4.9 | 6.5 | 0.0 | -12.6 | -11.2 | -17.9 | -0.1 | 4.5+115 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.4 | 55.0%Market 46.5% | +0.182u+18.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 4.5: model 4.9 vs RotoWire 6.5 vs internal injury model 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -17.9, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 55.0%, EV +0.182 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Megan DiLeo · POR | 3PM | 1.3 | 1.4 | -0.1 | -12.6 | -11.2 | -17.9 | -0.1 | 1.5+108 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.2 | 44.3%Market 48.1% | -0.079u-7.9% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.4 vs internal injury model 1.4. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.3%, EV -0.079 units per unit risked. |
| — | POR @ ATLAug 28, 2026 | Emily Engstler · POR | REB | 6.1 | 7.7 | 0.0 | -13.5 | -10.7 | -15.3 | -0.7 | 5.5-157 | over PORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.6 | 56.8%Market 61.1% | -0.070u-7.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 5.5: model 6.1 vs RotoWire 7.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.7, rebound matchup grade -15.3, 26.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.8%, EV -0.070 units per unit risked. |
Outcome counts use the forward tracker and settle from completed boxscores. Financial results appear only for records explicitly scoped to authoritative sportsbook prices. Every eligible sportsbook pick is sized to profit one unit on a win.
Settled — through — · predictions captured through —| Points | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| Rebounds | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| 3PM | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| Game Totals | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions— |
Numbered by configured priority. Books holding no posted rows today are omitted rather than ranked above the ones every captured line came from.
Every entity links into the same projection and tracking graph.
Raw projections stay visible even when a primary line has not posted.