W-L includes settled directions. Profit and risk use captured prices only; authorized assumed-price history stays separate.
| Category | Settled W-L | Win % | Captured net | Captured priced | Assumed priced / net | Captured risk | Settled slates | Dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| Rebounds | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| 3PM | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction 2026-08-28 |
| Game Totals | 0-0 | 0.0% | Unavailable | 0 | 0 / Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisionsLatest prediction — |
Tipoff has passed or could not be verified. Projections and ranks remain visible only as dated audit evidence.
Ranks, projections, captured lines, and model directions are preserved for audit. They are not an active card after tip or during degraded recovery.
Over 13.5: model 14.6 vs RotoWire 15.7 vs internal injury model 17.9. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +1.7, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 54.8%, EV +0.025 units per unit risked.
Over 5.5: model 5.6 vs RotoWire 7.4 vs internal injury model 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.9%, EV -0.110 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.2 projected minutes.
Over 2.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -13.9, 24.9 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.7%, EV -0.072 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.5 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 24.9 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 37.4%, EV -0.248 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 9.3 vs RotoWire 9.9 vs internal injury model 8.9. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation +0.2, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.2%, EV -0.080 units per unit risked.
Over 3.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7 vs internal injury model 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -12.4, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 43.9%, EV +0.066 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.47.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 29.8 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 9.2 vs RotoWire 10.7 vs internal injury model 8.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.4, 32.5 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV -0.028 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 1.7 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.0, 32.5 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 7.5 vs RotoWire 9.1. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 25.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%.
Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 4.3 vs internal injury model 2.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -10.8, 25.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 25.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 6.8 vs RotoWire 8.7 vs internal injury model 6.9. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.6, 24.9 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 7.7 vs internal injury model 5.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.5, rebound matchup grade -6.9, 24.9 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 24.9 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.2 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation -2.5, 10.1 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, rebound matchup grade -9.7, 10.1 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 10.1 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 3.4 vs RotoWire 3.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.3, 10.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade -7.7, 10.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 10.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -3.8, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -4.5, rebound matchup grade -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.5 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.4, 12.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 12.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 12.2 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -4.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 9.1. injury/rotation -9.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 6.0. injury/rotation -6.0, rebound matchup grade -4.4, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. injury/rotation -0.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 25.5: model 25.1 vs RotoWire 22.5 vs internal injury model 23.8. shot zones -0.7, injury/rotation -0.5, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV +0.001 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.43.
Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 2.4 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +2.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.5%, EV -0.176 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 2.5 vs RotoWire 2.6 vs internal injury model 2.5. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.1%, EV -0.211 units per unit risked.
Over 3.5: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +8.5, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.4%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked.
Over 2.5: model 2.5 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.6. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.1, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.9%, EV -0.154 units per unit risked.
Over 16.5: model 16.9 vs RotoWire 16.7 vs internal injury model 18.2. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV -0.074 units per unit risked.
| Short writeup | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aaliyah Edwards · CON | PTS | 14.6 | 15.7 | +0.3 | +15.8 | -36.7 | -9.5 | +1.7 | 13.5-115 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | 1.1 | 54.8%Market 53.5% | +0.025u+2.5% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 13.5: model 14.6 vs RotoWire 15.7 vs internal injury model 17.9. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +1.7, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 54.8%, EV +0.025 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aaliyah Edwards · CON | REB | 5.6 | 7.4 | 0.0 | +15.8 | -36.7 | -9.5 | +0.6 | 5.5-134 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 50.9%Market 57.3% | -0.110u-11.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 5.5: model 5.6 vs RotoWire 7.4 vs internal injury model 7.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.6, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 30.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.9%, EV -0.110 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aaliyah Edwards · CON | 3PM | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | +15.8 | -36.7 | -9.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Diamond Miller · CON | REB | 3.0 | 3.7 | 0.0 | -1.7 | -30.4 | -13.9 | -0.2 | 2.5-157 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.5 | 56.7%Market 61.1% | -0.072u-7.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Medium research signal | Over 2.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -13.9, 24.9 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.7%, EV -0.072 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Diamond Miller · CON | 3PM | 1.0 | 1.5 | -0.1 | -1.7 | -30.4 | -13.9 | -0.1 | 1.5+101 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.5 | 37.4%Market 49.8% | -0.248u-24.8% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.5 vs internal injury model 1.1. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 24.9 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 37.4%, EV -0.248 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Saniya Rivers · CON | PTS | 9.3 | 9.9 | +0.2 | +8.0 | -31.8 | -12.4 | +0.2 | 9.5-115 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.2%Market 53.5% | -0.080u-8.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 9.3 vs RotoWire 9.9 vs internal injury model 8.9. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation +0.2, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.2%, EV -0.080 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Saniya Rivers · CON | REB | 3.0 | 3.7 | 0.0 | +8.0 | -31.8 | -12.4 | 0.0 | 3.5+143 | over CONArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.5 | 43.9%Market 41.2% | +0.066u+6.6% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 3.5: model 3.0 vs RotoWire 3.7 vs internal injury model 3.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -12.4, 29.8 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 43.9%, EV +0.066 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.47. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Saniya Rivers · CON | 3PM | 0.3 | 0.8 | -0.0 | +8.0 | -31.8 | -12.4 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 29.8 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Charlisse Leger-Walker · CON | PTS | 9.2 | 10.7 | +0.1 | -3.6 | -34.6 | -12.8 | +0.4 | 9.5+102 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.3 | 48.1%Market 49.5% | -0.028u-2.8% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 9.2 vs RotoWire 10.7 vs internal injury model 8.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.4, 32.5 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV -0.028 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Charlisse Leger-Walker · CON | 3PM | 0.9 | 1.7 | -0.1 | -3.6 | -34.6 | -12.8 | -0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 1.7 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.0, 32.5 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Nell Angloma · CON | PTS | 7.5 | 9.1 | +0.3 | +6.9 | -34.9 | -10.8 | +0.7 | 7.5Line only | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.1 | 49.7% | —Captured price needed | PrizePicks | Market matches model | Projection context: model 7.5 vs RotoWire 9.1. shot zones +0.3, injury/rotation +0.7, 25.2 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.7%. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Nell Angloma · CON | REB | 1.6 | 4.3 | 0.0 | +6.9 | -34.9 | -10.8 | +0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 4.3 vs internal injury model 2.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -10.8, 25.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Nell Angloma · CON | 3PM | 0.2 | 0.4 | -0.0 | +6.9 | -34.9 | -10.8 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 25.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raegan Beers · CON | PTS | 6.8 | 8.7 | +0.1 | +15.4 | -28.4 | -6.9 | +0.6 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 6.8 vs RotoWire 8.7 vs internal injury model 6.9. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.6, 24.9 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raegan Beers · CON | REB | 4.5 | 7.7 | 0.0 | +15.4 | -28.4 | -6.9 | +0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 7.7 vs internal injury model 5.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.5, rebound matchup grade -6.9, 24.9 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Raegan Beers · CON | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.0 | +15.4 | -28.4 | -6.9 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.1. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 24.9 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Hailey Van Lith · CON | PTS | 3.2 | 3.2 | +0.2 | +2.0 | -32.8 | -9.7 | -2.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.2 vs RotoWire 3.2. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation -2.5, 10.1 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Hailey Van Lith · CON | REB | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | +2.0 | -32.8 | -9.7 | -0.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.9 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, rebound matchup grade -9.7, 10.1 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Hailey Van Lith · CON | 3PM | 0.3 | 0.5 | -0.0 | +2.0 | -32.8 | -9.7 | -0.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.5 vs internal injury model 0.3. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.3, 10.1 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Gianna Kneepkens · CON | PTS | 3.4 | 3.1 | +0.1 | -6.3 | -33.5 | -7.7 | -1.3 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 3.4 vs RotoWire 3.1. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.3, 10.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Gianna Kneepkens · CON | REB | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | -6.3 | -33.5 | -7.7 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.3 vs RotoWire 1.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade -7.7, 10.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Gianna Kneepkens · CON | 3PM | 0.3 | 0.4 | -0.0 | -6.3 | -33.5 | -7.7 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 10.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Rayah Marshall · CON | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +4.8 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -3.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -3.8, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Rayah Marshall · CON | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +4.8 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -4.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -4.5, rebound matchup grade -0.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Rayah Marshall · CON | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +4.8 | 0.0 | -0.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Ashlon Jackson · CON | PTS | 2.3 | 2.5 | +0.1 | -17.1 | -35.1 | -9.5 | -0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.3 vs RotoWire 2.5 vs internal injury model 2.4. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.4, 12.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Ashlon Jackson · CON | REB | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.0 | -17.1 | -35.1 | -9.5 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -9.5, 12.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Ashlon Jackson · CON | 3PM | 0.3 | 0.4 | -0.0 | -17.1 | -35.1 | -9.5 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.3 vs RotoWire 0.4 vs internal injury model 0.4. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 12.2 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Griner · CON | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Griner · CON | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -4.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Griner · CON | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Olivia Nelson-Ododa · CON | PTS | 0.0 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.4 | -9.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 9.1. injury/rotation -9.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Olivia Nelson-Ododa · CON | REB | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.4 | -6.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 6.0. injury/rotation -6.0, rebound matchup grade -4.4, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Olivia Nelson-Ododa · CON | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.4 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.1. injury/rotation -0.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Kelsey Mitchell · IND | PTS | 25.1 | 22.5 | -0.7 | -6.2 | -18.6 | +2.1 | -0.5 | 25.5+108 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.4 | 48.1%Market 48.1% | +0.001u+0.1% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 25.5: model 25.1 vs RotoWire 22.5 vs internal injury model 23.8. shot zones -0.7, injury/rotation -0.5, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 48.1%, EV +0.001 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta -0.43. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Kelsey Mitchell · IND | REB | 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.0 | -6.2 | -18.6 | +2.1 | -0.1 | 1.5-167 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 51.5%Market 62.5% | -0.176u-17.6% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 2.4 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +2.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.5%, EV -0.176 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Kelsey Mitchell · IND | 3PM | 2.5 | 2.6 | -0.2 | -6.2 | -18.6 | +2.1 | -0.1 | 2.5-165 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.0 | 49.1%Market 62.3% | -0.211u-21.1% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 2.5 vs RotoWire 2.6 vs internal injury model 2.5. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.1%, EV -0.211 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Caitlin Clark · IND | REB | 4.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | -7.6 | -17.5 | +8.5 | 0.0 | 3.5-129 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.5 | 56.4%Market 56.3% | +0.002u+0.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 3.5: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 5.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +8.5, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 56.4%, EV +0.002 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Caitlin Clark · IND | 3PM | 2.5 | 2.7 | -0.2 | -7.6 | -17.5 | +8.5 | -0.1 | 2.5-151 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.9%Market 60.2% | -0.154u-15.4% model ROI | Draftkings | Low research signal | Over 2.5: model 2.5 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.6. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -0.1, 34.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.9%, EV -0.154 units per unit risked. |
| — | CON @ INDAug 28, 2026 | Aliyah Boston · IND | PTS | 16.9 | 16.7 | +0.1 | +8.2 | -19.4 | +13.6 | +0.9 | 16.5-127 | over INDArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.4 | 51.8%Market 55.9% | -0.074u-7.4% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 16.5: model 16.9 vs RotoWire 16.7 vs internal injury model 18.2. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.9, 29.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV -0.074 units per unit risked. |
Outcome counts use the forward tracker and settle from completed boxscores. Financial results appear only for records explicitly scoped to authoritative sportsbook prices. Every eligible sportsbook pick is sized to profit one unit on a win.
Settled — through — · predictions captured through —| Points | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| Rebounds | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| 3PM | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions2026-08-28 |
| Game Totals | 0-0 | 0 | — | Unavailable | 0 | 0 | Unavailable | Unavailable | 0 | No settled decisions— |
Numbered by configured priority. Books holding no posted rows today are omitted rather than ranked above the ones every captured line came from.
Every entity links into the same projection and tracking graph.
Raw projections stay visible even when a primary line has not posted.