The game has tipped. Pre-tip projections remain as archived audit evidence while final results are pending.
This game has tipped but has not been marked final. The page preserves the pre-tip model for audit and hides all active target framing.
Ranks, projections, captured lines, and model directions remain visible for audit only.
Projection context: model 14.5 vs RotoWire 16.3 vs internal injury model 14.6. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation -1.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV -0.054 units per unit risked.
Over 7.5: model 8.2 vs RotoWire 9.2 vs internal injury model 8.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.7, rebound matchup grade +9.2, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 57.5%, EV +0.123 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 35.4%, EV -0.063 units per unit risked.
Over 12.5: model 12.5 vs RotoWire 14.0 vs internal injury model 12.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.1%, EV -0.113 units per unit risked.
Over 5.5: model 5.5 vs RotoWire 6.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +5.9, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV +0.010 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta +0.00.
Projection context: model 1.2 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 1.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 32.0 projected minutes.
Over 9.5: model 9.7 vs RotoWire 11.8 vs internal injury model 10.2. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.0%, EV +0.009 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 2.2 vs RotoWire 2.8 vs internal injury model 2.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -0.8, 27.0 projected minutes.
Over 1.5: model 2.0 vs RotoWire 2.3 vs internal injury model 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 60.9%, EV -0.017 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 8.3 vs RotoWire 9.0 vs internal injury model 7.9. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.4, 24.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.0%, EV -0.072 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 5.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, rebound matchup grade -0.8, 24.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV -0.106 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 24.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 5.6 vs RotoWire 4.2 vs internal injury model 5.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.4, 12.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -1.2, 12.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.4, 12.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 6.5. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.4, 22.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 3.6 vs internal injury model 2.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -0.8, 22.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 1.1 vs internal injury model 0.5. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.0, 22.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.7 vs RotoWire 3.2 vs internal injury model 2.8. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.7, 13.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 2.0 vs RotoWire 2.5 vs internal injury model 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade +3.0, 13.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 13.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 3.1. injury/rotation +0.0, 8.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 1.6 vs internal injury model 0.1. injury/rotation -1.0, rebound matchup grade +0.1, 8.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.5. injury/rotation +0.0, 8.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +10.2, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.1, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.8, 0.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes.
Over 0.5: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 59.5%, EV -0.123 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 2.2 vs RotoWire 2.1 vs internal injury model 2.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.5%, EV -0.165 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 2.7 vs RotoWire 3.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -1.0, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 39.2%, EV -0.107 units per unit risked.
Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 1.6 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV +0.041 units per unit risked.
Projection context: model 2.4 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.5. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -4.8, 6.0 projected minutes.
Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade -0.5, 6.0 projected minutes.
| Short writeup | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Isabelle Harrison · TOR | PTS | 14.5 | 16.3 | +0.2 | +8.3 | +4.6 | +9.2 | -1.1 | 14.5-112 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.0%Market 52.8% | -0.054u-5.4% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 14.5 vs RotoWire 16.3 vs internal injury model 14.6. shot zones +0.2, injury/rotation -1.1, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV -0.054 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Isabelle Harrison · TOR | REB | 8.2 | 9.2 | 0.0 | +8.3 | +4.6 | +9.2 | -0.7 | 7.5-105 | over TORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.7 | 57.5%Market 51.2% | +0.123u+12.3% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 7.5: model 8.2 vs RotoWire 9.2 vs internal injury model 8.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.7, rebound matchup grade +9.2, 30.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 57.5%, EV +0.123 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Isabelle Harrison · TOR | 3PM | 0.8 | 0.9 | -0.0 | +8.3 | +4.6 | +9.2 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 30.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Kiki Rice · TOR | 3PM | 1.0 | 1.3 | +0.0 | +7.3 | +3.6 | -0.3 | -0.2 | 1.5+165 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.5 | 35.4%Market 37.7% | -0.063u-6.3% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 1.0 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 1.0. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 35.4%, EV -0.063 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Laura Juskaite · TOR | PTS | 12.5 | 14.0 | 0.0 | +3.4 | +2.7 | +5.9 | -0.2 | 12.5-130 | over TORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.1%Market 56.5% | -0.113u-11.3% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 12.5: model 12.5 vs RotoWire 14.0 vs internal injury model 12.7. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.1%, EV -0.113 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Laura Juskaite · TOR | REB | 5.5 | 6.5 | 0.0 | +3.4 | +2.7 | +5.9 | -0.1 | 5.5+102 | over TORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.0%Market 49.5% | +0.010u+1.0% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Positive-EV over at captured price | Over 5.5: model 5.5 vs RotoWire 6.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade +5.9, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV +0.010 units per unit risked, price-supported over despite model-line delta +0.00. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Laura Juskaite · TOR | 3PM | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.0 | +3.4 | +2.7 | +5.9 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.2 vs RotoWire 1.3 vs internal injury model 1.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 32.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Kia Nurse · TOR | PTS | 9.7 | 11.8 | +0.1 | +3.7 | +3.9 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 9.5-102 | over TORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.2 | 51.0%Market 50.5% | +0.009u+0.9% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Low research signal | Over 9.5: model 9.7 vs RotoWire 11.8 vs internal injury model 10.2. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.0, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.0%, EV +0.009 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Kia Nurse · TOR | REB | 2.2 | 2.8 | 0.0 | +3.7 | +3.9 | -0.8 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.2 vs RotoWire 2.8 vs internal injury model 2.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, rebound matchup grade -0.8, 27.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Kia Nurse · TOR | 3PM | 2.0 | 2.3 | +0.0 | +3.7 | +3.9 | -0.8 | -0.1 | 1.5-163 | over TORArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.5 | 60.9%Market 62.0% | -0.017u-1.7% model ROI | Draftkings | High research signal | Over 1.5: model 2.0 vs RotoWire 2.3 vs internal injury model 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 27.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 60.9%, EV -0.017 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Temi Fagbenle · TOR | PTS | 8.3 | 9.0 | +0.1 | -0.6 | -1.8 | -0.8 | -1.4 | 8.5-112 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.2 | 49.0%Market 52.8% | -0.072u-7.2% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 8.3 vs RotoWire 9.0 vs internal injury model 7.9. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.4, 24.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 49.0%, EV -0.072 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Temi Fagbenle · TOR | REB | 4.5 | 5.3 | 0.0 | -0.6 | -1.8 | -0.8 | -0.8 | 4.5-127 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.0 | 50.0%Market 55.9% | -0.106u-10.6% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 4.5 vs RotoWire 5.3. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.8, rebound matchup grade -0.8, 24.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 50.0%, EV -0.106 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Temi Fagbenle · TOR | 3PM | 0.5 | 0.7 | +0.0 | -0.6 | -1.8 | -0.8 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.5 vs RotoWire 0.7 vs internal injury model 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, 24.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Kiana Williams · TOR | PTS | 5.6 | 4.2 | +0.1 | +8.0 | +4.6 | -1.2 | -1.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 5.6 vs RotoWire 4.2 vs internal injury model 5.7. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -1.4, 12.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Kiana Williams · TOR | REB | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | +8.0 | +4.6 | -1.2 | -0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.7 vs RotoWire 0.6. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.2, rebound matchup grade -1.2, 12.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Kiana Williams · TOR | 3PM | 1.1 | 0.8 | +0.0 | +8.0 | +4.6 | -1.2 | -0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.1 vs RotoWire 0.8 vs internal injury model 1.2. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.4, 12.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Ornella Bankole · TOR | PTS | 4.0 | 6.5 | +0.1 | +3.1 | +1.5 | -0.8 | +0.4 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 4.0 vs RotoWire 6.5. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation +0.4, 22.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Ornella Bankole · TOR | REB | 1.5 | 3.6 | 0.0 | +3.1 | +1.5 | -0.8 | +0.2 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 1.5 vs RotoWire 3.6 vs internal injury model 2.5. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.2, rebound matchup grade -0.8, 22.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Ornella Bankole · TOR | 3PM | 0.4 | 1.1 | +0.1 | +3.1 | +1.5 | -0.8 | -0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.4 vs RotoWire 1.1 vs internal injury model 0.5. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.0, 22.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Teonni Key · TOR | PTS | 2.7 | 3.2 | +0.1 | +2.5 | +0.9 | +3.0 | -0.7 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.7 vs RotoWire 3.2 vs internal injury model 2.8. shot zones +0.1, injury/rotation -0.7, 13.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Teonni Key · TOR | REB | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | +2.5 | +0.9 | +3.0 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.0 vs RotoWire 2.5 vs internal injury model 2.1. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade +3.0, 13.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Teonni Key · TOR | 3PM | 0.1 | 0.2 | -0.0 | +2.5 | +0.9 | +3.0 | -0.1 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.1 vs RotoWire 0.2 vs internal injury model 0.2. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 13.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Zaay Green · TOR | PTS | 0.0 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 3.1. injury/rotation +0.0, 8.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Zaay Green · TOR | REB | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | -1.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 1.6 vs internal injury model 0.1. injury/rotation -1.0, rebound matchup grade +0.1, 8.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Zaay Green · TOR | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.5. injury/rotation +0.0, 8.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Aneesah Morrow · TOR | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +10.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Aneesah Morrow · TOR | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +10.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +10.2, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Aneesah Morrow · TOR | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +10.2 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Sykes · TOR | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Sykes · TOR | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.1, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Brittney Sykes · TOR | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Marina Mabrey · TOR | PTS | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.8 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Marina Mabrey · TOR | REB | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.8 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade +0.8, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Marina Mabrey · TOR | 3PM | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.8 | 0.0 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.0 vs RotoWire 0.0. injury/rotation +0.0, 0.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | A'ja Wilson · LV | 3PM | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | -4.6 | -0.2 | +8.8 | -0.1 | 0.5-211 | over LVArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.3 | 59.5%Market 67.8% | -0.123u-12.3% model ROI | Draftkings | High research signal | Over 0.5: model 0.8 vs RotoWire 0.9 vs internal injury model 0.9. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 59.5%, EV -0.123 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Jackie Young · LV | 3PM | 2.3 | 2.1 | -0.1 | -4.5 | -1.8 | +2.0 | -0.1 | 2.5-114 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.3 | 44.5%Market 53.3% | -0.165u-16.5% model ROI | Draftkings | Market matches model | Projection context: model 2.2 vs RotoWire 2.1 vs internal injury model 2.3. shot zones -0.1, injury/rotation -0.1, 33.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 44.5%, EV -0.165 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Chelsea Gray · LV | REB | 2.7 | 3.8 | 0.0 | -7.0 | -0.7 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 3.5+128 | No leanArchived pre-tip evidence | -0.8 | 39.2%Market 43.9% | -0.107u-10.7% model ROI | Underdog Fantasy | Market matches model | Projection context: model 2.7 vs RotoWire 3.8. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation +0.0, rebound matchup grade -1.0, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 39.2%, EV -0.107 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Chelsea Gray · LV | 3PM | 1.6 | 1.6 | -0.0 | -7.0 | -0.7 | -1.0 | -0.1 | 1.5+101 | over LVArchived pre-tip evidence | 0.1 | 51.8%Market 49.8% | +0.041u+4.1% model ROI | Draftkings | Low research signal | Over 1.5: model 1.6 vs RotoWire 1.6 vs internal injury model 1.7. shot zones -0.0, injury/rotation -0.1, 32.0 projected minutes, calibrated cover probability 51.8%, EV +0.041 units per unit risked. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Mai Yamamoto · LV | PTS | 2.4 | 2.7 | -0.2 | -3.3 | +0.1 | -0.5 | -4.8 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 2.4 vs RotoWire 2.7 vs internal injury model 2.5. shot zones -0.2, injury/rotation -4.8, 6.0 projected minutes. |
| — | TOR @ LVAug 28, 2026 | Mai Yamamoto · LV | REB | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | -3.3 | +0.1 | -0.5 | -0.5 | Not posted | Projection onlyArchived pre-tip evidence | — | — | —Captured price needed | Waiting | Projection only | Projection context: model 0.2 vs RotoWire 0.4. shot zones +0.0, injury/rotation -0.5, rebound matchup grade -0.5, 6.0 projected minutes. |
Bars run toward the team that leads each metric, sized by the gap. Defense and turnover rows score the lower number as the lead.
| Away | Metric | Home | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11-27 | Context: Record | 26-14 | Higher is better |
| 1-9 | Context: Last 10 | 6-4 | Higher is better |
| 83.2 | Context: Pace | 82.6 | Context only; no leader declared |
| 87.0 | Offense: Points per game | 90.4 | Higher is better |
| 104.5 | Offense: Offensive rating | 109.6 | Higher is better |
| 19.9 | Offense: Assists | 21.9 | Higher is better |
| 50.0% | Shooting: Effective FG% | 50.0% | Higher is better |
| 40.0% | Shooting: 3-point rate | 30.0% | Context only; no leader declared |
| 35.5 | Shooting: Paint points | 39.9 | Higher is better |
| 93.6 | Defense: Opponent points | 87.0 | Lower is better |
| 112.6 | Defense: Defensive rating | 105.6 | Lower is better |
| 50.0% | Defense: Opponent eFG% | 50.0% | Lower is better |
| 31.6 | Possession: Rebounds | 33.4 | Higher is better |
| 14.4 | Possession: Turnovers | 12.2 | Lower is better |
Player and team names remain navigable from both tables.
TOR projected rotation. Every player opens a full profile.
| Kiki Rice | G | starter | 32.0 | 14.5 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 22.0 | 72.0% |
| Laura Juskaite | F | starter | 32.0 | 12.6 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 20.2 | 72.0% |
| Isabelle Harrison | F | starter | 30.0 | 14.5 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 24.6 | 72.0% |
| Kia Nurse | G | starter | 27.0 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 14.4 | 72.0% |
| Temi Fagbenle | C | starter | 24.0 | 7.8 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 13.5 | 72.0% |
| Ornella Bankole | G | restricted | 22.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 7.0 | 72.0% |
| Teonni Key | F | restricted | 13.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 5.2 | 72.0% |
| Kiana Williams | G | restricted | 12.0 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 7.9 | 72.0% |
| Zaay Green | G | restricted | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 72.0% |
| Aneesah Morrow | F | bench | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
| Brittney Sykes | G | bench | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
| Marina Mabrey | G | bench | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
LV projected rotation. Every player opens a full profile.
| A'ja Wilson | C | starter | 33.0 | 25.3 | 9.0 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 37.2 | 72.0% |
| Jackie Young | G | starter | 33.0 | 19.2 | 4.3 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 29.8 | 72.0% |
| Chelsea Gray | G | starter | 32.0 | 10.8 | 2.7 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 19.8 | 72.0% |
| Jewell Loyd | G | restricted | 29.0 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 10.1 | 72.0% |
| Brianna Turner | F | restricted | 19.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 72.0% |
| Cheyenne Parker-Tyus | F | restricted | 10.0 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 8.1 | 72.0% |
| Stephanie Talbot | F | starter | 10.0 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 72.0% |
| Kierstan Bell | F | restricted | 10.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 4.2 | 72.0% |
| Dana Evans | G | bench | 10.0 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 5.0 | — |
| Justine Pissott | G | restricted | 7.0 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 4.9 | 72.0% |
| Mai Yamamoto | G | bench | 6.0 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 72.0% |
| Ta'Niya Latson | G | restricted | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 72.0% |
| NaLyssa Smith | F | bench | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
Compare where each offense has taken and converted shots across the 2026 season.
Compare where each team suppresses or allows made shots.
Positive zones have allowed more made shots than league context; negative zones have suppressed them.
Source: current_zone_team_defense_recency_blend
Read zone signals together with projected minutes, current injuries, and lineup status.
Source: current_zone_team_defense_recency_blend
Completed meetings, linked to each game and both team profiles.
| Aug 23, 2026 | LV @ TOR | Las Vegas Aces | Toronto Tempo | 88-78 | LV |
| Jul 20, 2026 | LV @ TOR | Las Vegas Aces | Toronto Tempo | 109-83 | LV |
Status: rotowire_projected.
Player rows blend the fitted baseline, current role and minutes, 2026 form, and zone-defense context. Market availability changes the displayed direction, not the raw projection.